Moseke v. Miller and Smith, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the continuing effects of the design and construction of a non-FHA compliant housing complex did not constitute a continuing violation
• finding that the continuing effects of the design and construction of a non-FHA compliant housing complex did not constitute a continuing violation
• “[An] FHA non-compliant building which contains inaccessible fea- tures to disabled persons is more akin to a continuing effect rather than a continuing violation under the FHA.”
• “[An] FHA non-compliant building which contains inaccessible fea- tures to disabled persons is more akin to a continuing effect rather than a continuing violation under the FHA.”
• “If the mere existence of a FHA non-compliant building is a continuing violation under the FHA then there is no limitations period on a disability discrimination claim involving design and construction.”
• distinguishing between the defendant’s acts and their continuing effects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).