Mosby v. Kelley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court’s reliance on minutes of testimony in conjunction with other evidence contained sufficient indicia of reliability
• explaining that prosecutorial misconduct requires a showing that the government’s conduct was improper and affected the defendant’s substantial rights
• emphasizing that the jury’s verdict should “stand unless the evidence weighs heavily enough against [it] . . . that a miscarriage of justice may have occurred” (quotation marks omitted)
• stating that to establish prosecutorial misconduct, the defendant must show that the government’s conduct was improper and affected his substantial rights so as to deprive him of a fair trial
• explaining that to establish prosecutorial misconduct, a defendant must show that the government’s conduct was improper and affected his substantial rights such that he was deprived of a fair proceeding
• explaining that claim of -2- prosecutorial misconduct requires a showing that the government’s conduct was improper and affected the defendant’s substantial rights so as to deprive him of a fair trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).