Skip to main content
· 12/15/1998

Mosbrucker v. United States (In Re Mosbrucker)

Citations

  • 227 B.R. 434
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1582
  • 83 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 341
  • 33 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 738
  • 1998 WL 865851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • exercising de novo review over a similar conclusion under § 507(a)(8)(C) of the Bankruptcy Code
  • exercising de novo review over a similar conclusion under § 507(a)(8)(C) of the Bankruptcy Code
  • applying Sotelo and holding an assessment under § 6672 was entitled to priority status as a “tax required to be collected or withheld” under Section 507(a)(8)(C) of the Bankruptcy Code, and not a penalty treated as an unsecured claim under Section 507(a)(7)(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koger, Roger, Scott, Mahoney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.