Morton's administrator v. Fox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, “[i]n the post-Janus world,” an executive may be held accountable where he “signed the company’s statement; ratified and approved the company’s statement; or where the statement is attributed to the executive”
• denying defendant Fannie Mae’s motion to dismiss stockholders § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claims because, in part, stockholders adequately alleged their investment loss was caused by misstatements of risk management controls
• explaining the proper reading of Lipsky

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).