Morton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the fact that “[n]o question was ever raised as to [the reservation of easements] until the plaintiff brought the present proceedings” was “a further indication of the intent of’ the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pamela A. MacLean v. Parkwood, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1966-01-11· cited 16×
• Busby v. State Ex Rel. Herman
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-11-03· cited 12×
• Capitol Plumbing & Heating Supply Co. v. State
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1976-08-31· cited 9×
• Paul Lynn & a. v. Wentworth By The Sea Master Association
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-05-27· cited 8×
• Tenn v. 889 Associates, Ltd.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-10-24· cited 6×
• Blaisdell v. Raab
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1990-03-08· cited 6×
• State Ex Rel. State Highway Department v. 14.69 Acres of Land
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1967-02-01· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wenton v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1956-11-30· cited 31×
• United States Gypsum Co. v. Mystic River Bridge Authority
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1952-06-12· cited 17×
• Department of Public Works & Buildings v. Finks
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1956-11-26· cited 16×
• Neuweiler v. Kauer
  Sandusky County Court of Common Pleas· 1951-11-17· cited 6×