Court of Appeals of Georgia· 6/19/1974
Morton v. State
Citations
- 208 S.E.2d 134
- 132 Ga. App. 329
- 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1683
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The reason for [OCGA § 17-8-57] prohibiting the judge from intimating his opinion as to what has been proved is to keep the jury from being influenced, not to keep the judge from making up his own mind.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deen, Eberhardt, Stolz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chumley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-01-08· cited 31×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1983-01-25· cited 27×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-11-10· cited 26×
- Quiller v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-07-15· cited 24×
- In the Interest of S. U.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-06-08· cited 9×
- Gibbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1974-10-11· cited 4×
- Cotton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-03-23· cited 4×
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-04-19· cited 4×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Holtzendorf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1972-03-17· cited 34×
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1966-02-18· cited 23×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1971-04-21· cited 11×
- Willard v. City of EatontonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1961-09-14· cited 10×
- Sorrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1924-07-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.