Morton v. Morton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \It has long been our public policy that the spendthrift provisions of a trust cannot defeat the claims of the wife of a beneficiary for maintenance and support.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Posner v. Sheridan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-01-19· cited 42×
• B.K. Medical Systems, Inc. Pension Plan v. Roberts (In Re Roberts)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-12-09· cited 36×
• Eisenberg v. Houck (In Re Houck)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-04-19· cited 25×
• Estate of Holtz v. Commissioner
  U.S. Tax Court· 1962-04-10· cited 20×
• Palmer K. Schreiber v. Christopher G. Kellogg
  Third Circuit· 1995-03-17· cited 14×
• Walsh v. Hendrickson (In Re Hendrickson)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2002-02-26· cited 10×
• Hudson v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-04-25· cited 6×
• Prestige Bank v. Investment Properties Group, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-23· cited 3×
• Walsh v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State Employment Retirement Board (In re Tykla)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-10-30· cited 1×