Skip to main content
· 5/15/1898

Morton v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.

Citations

  • 20 Ohio C.C. 666

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming rejection under 35 U.S.C. Sec. 103 without citation of any prior art based on facts that were unchallenged by the appellant
  • affirming rejection where examiner took “[official notice of the existence in the art of such recording and re-recording steps” for copying the contents of one audio tape onto another
  • affirming rejection where examiner took “[o]fficial notice of the existence in the art of such recording and re-recording steps” for copying the contents of one audio tape onto another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day, Price, Seney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.