· 11/20/2001
Morton v. GTE Southwest Inc. (Wieburg)
Citations
- 272 F.3d 302
- 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 405
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24854
- 38 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 196
- 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,839
- 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 445
- 2001 WL 1355344
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trustee is the real party in interest and has exclusive standing to assert pre-petition claims
- holding that trial court abused discretion by dismissing action and failing to explain why a stay allowing for trustee intervention was not the more appropriate alternative
- indicating that, on remand, the district court should consider the effect of dismissal on the plaintiff’s creditors, in deciding whether to allow the bankruptcy trustee to substi- tute or join
- holding “[u]nder these circumstances, and in the light of Rule 17(a
- vacating dismissal' of a claim due to lack of standing where substitution of the trustee was not considered
- addressing a motion to substitute as the proper party in interest under Rule 17(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jolly, Smith, Wiener
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.