Skip to main content
· 11/20/2001

Morton v. GTE Southwest Inc. (Wieburg)

Citations

  • 272 F.3d 302
  • 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 405
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24854
  • 38 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 196
  • 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,839
  • 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 445
  • 2001 WL 1355344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trustee is the real party in interest and has exclusive standing to assert pre-petition claims
  • holding that trial court abused discretion by dismissing action and failing to explain why a stay allowing for trustee intervention was not the more appropriate alternative
  • indicating that, on remand, the district court should consider the effect of dismissal on the plaintiff’s creditors, in deciding whether to allow the bankruptcy trustee to substi- tute or join
  • holding “[u]nder these circumstances, and in the light of Rule 17(a
  • vacating dismissal' of a claim due to lack of standing where substitution of the trustee was not considered
  • addressing a motion to substitute as the proper party in interest under Rule 17(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Smith, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.