Morton v. Flanagan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “two notes . . . were admissible because they were not offered into evidence ‘to prove the truth of the matter[s] asserted’ ”
• “The two notes from Stafford were admissible because they were not offered into evidence To prove the truth of the matter [s] asserted’. . . .”
• “[a] photographic identification procedure or lineup violates due process guarantees when it is so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a substantial likelihood of misidentification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).