Morton v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a plaintiff who had alleged that the defendant took no action despite knowing that her apartment had no thermostat and that vermin were eating her son’s feeding tube, depriving him of essential nutrition, had adequately stated an IIED claim
• denying motion to dismiss IIED claim where “a reasonable juror could find that the Housing Authority’s conduct was outrageous and committed in reckless disregard of the plaintiffs’ welfare”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).