Morsicato v. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that medical expert testimony regarding causation cannot be highly speculative, but must be made \to a reasonable degree of medical probability\
• reversing the district court because a defense expert could not state that an alternative theory of causation was “more likely than not” the cause of the plaintiff’s injuries
• \Not all medical expert testimony must be stated with a reasonable degree of medical probability.\
• \Not all medical expert testimony must be stated with a reasonable degree of medical probability.\
• The Supreme Court of Nevada concluded that a medical expert testimony on causation did not rise to the level of medical probability because the 3|| expert “was not certain what caused [the plaintiff’s] injuries” and opined that other causes could 4|| just as plausibly explain them.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).