Morse/diesel, Inc. v. Trinity Industries, Inc. Mosher Steel Company, and Aetna Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that charging error required retrial because “[w]e d[id] not know what the jury would have done had it received a correct instruction”
• holding charging error required retrial because court could not know what jury would have done \had it received a correct instruction\
• stating in dicta that expert testimony of certified public accountants is likely to be admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).