Morsa v. Office

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Winter “requires a party seeking preliminary relief to satisfy all four prongs of the preliminary-injunction standard, and does not employ a sliding scale” (citing Pashby v. Delia, 709 F.3d 307, 320 (4th Cir. 2013); Winter, 555 U.S. at 20)
• explaining how “condemnation proceedings may not be used to mount a collateral attack” on a FERC certificate
• “[W]hen anticipated economic losses will be recoverable at the end of litigation, then those losses generally will not qualify as irreparable for purposes of preliminary relief.”
• “Only when a temporary delay in recovery somehow translates to permanent injury—threatening a party's very existence by, for instance, driving it out of business before litigation concludes—could it qualify as irreparable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).