Morrow v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the appellate court was not able to review the postconviction court’s determination that an Apprendi/Blakely violation was harmless where the record did not include the entire trial transcript
• “[Wjithout the entire trial transcript, we are unable to meaningfully review the trial court’s determination that the Apprendi/Blakely violation was harmless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Plott v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-01· cited 3×
• Plasencia v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-17· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Galindez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-02-15· cited 159×
• Steward v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-28· cited 7×
• Plott v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-02· cited 7×
• Morrow v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-13· cited 2×