Morrow v. Kessler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing plaintiffs until “60 days after substantial completion of . . . document production” to respond to defendants’ contention interrogatories
• denying motion to compel and ordering plaintiffs to answer contention interrogatories 60 days after completion of defendants' document production
• discussing the “many different kinds of 2 questions” to which the phrase “contention interrogatory” may “imprecisely” refer
• “Tailoring probes and responses to the real issues in the case at hand, rather 25 26 2 See also Bowen v. Warden Baldwin State Prison, 826 F.3d 1312, 1323 n.27 (11th Cir. 2016
• fee awards that involve a sliding scale dependent on the ultimate recovery for which the percentage of the funds devoted to attorneys’ fees will decrease as the size of the funds increases
• “In this section the court develops a framework for handling contention interrogatories that are served before substantial discovery has been completed through other means.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).