Morrow v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While to constitute the offense of embezzlement it is necessary that there be a criminal intent, yet where the money of the principal is knowingly used by the agent in violation of his duty, it is nonetheless embezzlement because at the time he intended to restore it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pratt
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1923-11-10· cited 27×
• United States v. Krull
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1953-07-31· cited 13×
• State v. Joy
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-04-29· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Duvall
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1927-06-24· cited 7×
• Sergent v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1935-02-01· cited 3×
• Rogers v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1936-05-12· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1903-02-10· cited 18×
• Standard Oil Co. v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1906-01-15· cited 8×