Morristown Daily Record, Inc. v. Graphic Communications Union, Local 8n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the phrasing of a grievance does not control its arbitrability
• “Rule 11 is not to be used routinely when the parties disagree about the correct resolution of a matter in litigation”
• although question of arbitrability “may entail some probing oí preliminary substantive issues, that requirement will not relieve courts of the duty to decide arbitrability”
• “The complication here arises from the failure of the collective bargaining agreement to define the term ‘applicant’ or to specify the procedure for determining whether to classify an individual as an ‘applicant’ or as an ‘employee.’ ”
• district court should venture “no farther than necessary into substantive issues”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).