Morrison Woolen Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the mere existence of a pattern of human rights violations in a particular country does not constitute a sufficient ground” to sustain a CAT claim (citation omitted)
• “[T]he mere existence of a pattern of human rights violations in a particular country does not constitute a sufficient ground for finding that a particular person would more likely than not be tortured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).