Morrison v. Starr

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 425

Syllabus

After neither party timely objected to a Special Master's Report and Recommendation, the Court determined that there was no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the Report and Recommendation and the Court adopted the Report and Recommendation. In accordance with the Special Master's recommendations and findings, the Court denied Respondent's motion to dismiss, found that Requester's claim for production of records was moot, and found that Respondent failed to produce requested public records within a reasonable period of time. Because Respondent denied Requester access to public records in violation of R.C. 149.43(B), the Court determined that Requester was entitled to recover from Respondent the amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any other costs associated with the action that were incurred by Requester, excepting attorney fees.