Morrison v. McClellan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reference to “Points I and II” of Appellate Division brief not sufficient under Grey; “Presentation requires more than a ‘general reference’ to the issues presented in an attached brief.”
• reference to “Points I and IP’ of Appellate Division brief not sufficient under Grey; “Presentation requires more than a ‘general reference’ to the issues presented in an attached brief.”
• “Although [Rosario] is generally considered to be New York's counterpart to a federal rule based on Jencks...the Jencks rule has not been construed as constitutional in nature.”
• “Any error under Rosario at trial would be a violation of state law, and, thus, not subject to review under a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).