Morrison v. Gowdy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting 25 “Article III standing is separate from, and not to be measured by, statutory standing.”
• noting “the strong trend in this district and in other courts is to require an in-state purchase to establish Article III standing for state antitrust and related consumer protection claims like the ones alleged in this case” and collecting eases
• “[I]t is a named plaintiff 17 who must possess the requisite standing; it is not sufficient that a putative class member may have 18 standing to press one of the claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).