Morrison v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the district court must determine whether these allegations are supported by the record and whether they rise to the level of imminent danger”
• holding that “the district court must determine whether these allegations are supported by the record and whether they rise to the level of imminent danger”
• holding that “the district court must determine whether these allegations are supported by the record and whether they rise to the level of imminent danger”
• holding that “the district court must determine whether these allegations are supported by the record and whether they rise to the level of imminent danger”
• explaining that § 1915(g) “requires that litigants allege sufficient facts to demonstrate a nexus between the claims presented and the imminent danger alleged”
• noting that “past allegations of danger or threats of harm on their own are insufficient to satisfy the [imminent danger] exception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).