Morrison v. Corliss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that trial court cannot maintain suit unless residency requirements of section 6.301 are met and that, when those requirements are not met, trial court typically abates suit so that residency requirements can be met
• determining mandamus relief appropriate when divorce proceeding could not be maintained in Texas; judgment would be reversed on appeal; both parties lived in Germany; neither party had any intent to move back to Texas; and single bank account was parties’ only connection to Texas
• determining mandamus relief appropriate when divorce proceeding could not be maintained in Texas; judgment would be reversed on appeal; both parties lived in Germany; neither party had any intent to move back to Texas; and single bank account was parties’ only connection to Texas
• “Because neither party will ever meet the residency requirements, the impediment to the trial court going forward with the suit cannot be removed[,]” and dismissal is the proper remedy
• “Because neither party will ever meet the residency requirements, the impediment to the trial court going forward with the suit cannot be removed[,]” and dismissal is the proper remedy
• “Because neither party will ever meet the residency requirements, the impediment to the trial court going forward with the suit cannot be removed[,]” and dismissal is the proper remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).