Skip to main content
· 1/22/2020

Morrison, K. v. Delaware County CCP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under the previous medical marijuana statutes, the existence of an applicable affirmative defense did not negate probable cause
  • explaining that “[a]n affirmative defense admits the defendant committed a criminal act but pleads an excuse for doing so”; it “does not negate any elements of the charged crime”
  • explaining that “[a]n affirmative defense admits the defendant committed a criminal act but pleads an excuse for doing so”
  • explaining that \[a]n affirmative defense admits the defendant committed a criminal act but pleads an excuse for doing so\; it \does not negate any elements of the charged crime\
  • suggesting the smell of marijuana wafting over a threshold provides probable cause to support a search warrant
  • suggesting the smell of marijuana wafting over a threshold provides probable cause to support a search warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.