Skip to main content
· 9/20/1996

Morris v. Siemens Components, Inc.

Citations

  • 938 F. Supp. 277
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13842
  • 1996 WL 537690

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a motion for reconsideration “may be denied solely on the basis of its untimeliness”
  • holding a motion for reconsideration may be denied solely for being untimely
  • holding a motion for reconsideration may be denied solely for being untimely
  • “A party’s mere disagreement with a decision of the district court should be raised in the ordinary appellate process and is inappropriate on a motion for reargument.”
  • “A party's mere disagreement with a decision of the district court should be raised in the ordinary appellate process and is inappropriate on a motion for reargument.”
  • “A party’s mere disagreement with a decision of the district court should be raised in the ordinary appellate process and is inappropriate on a motion for reargument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orlofsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.