· 9/20/1996
Morris v. Siemens Components, Inc.
Citations
- 938 F. Supp. 277
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13842
- 1996 WL 537690
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a motion for reconsideration “may be denied solely on the basis of its untimeliness”
- holding a motion for reconsideration may be denied solely for being untimely
- holding a motion for reconsideration may be denied solely for being untimely
- “A party’s mere disagreement with a decision of the district court should be raised in the ordinary appellate process and is inappropriate on a motion for reargument.”
- “A party's mere disagreement with a decision of the district court should be raised in the ordinary appellate process and is inappropriate on a motion for reargument.”
- “A party’s mere disagreement with a decision of the district court should be raised in the ordinary appellate process and is inappropriate on a motion for reargument.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orlofsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.