Skip to main content
D. New Jersey· 5/31/1996

Morris v. Siemens Components, Inc.

Citations

  • 928 F. Supp. 486
  • 5 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1170
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8241
  • 1996 WL 294074

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the plaintiff was judicially estopped from arguing that she was qualified to perform her job at the time of her discharge when she simultaneously represented that she was unable to work in her application for employment benefits
  • “Although the timing of a discharge may be significant, it, alone, cannot raise an inference of causation sufficient to establish a prima facie case of retaliation.”
  • plaintiff estopped from claiming that termination was in violation of NJLAD where “summary judgment record [was] replete with certifications of [p]laintiff that she was unable to work and incapable of performing the duties of her job at the time she was discharged”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orlofsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Morris v. Siemens Components, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.