Morris v. Morris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in child custody appeal, stating: “We are not unmindful of our rule that the paramount consideration is the welfare of the children. The court continues to be the protector of the children with power to act in the future for their protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Silseth v. Levang
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1974-01-03· cited 36×
• Enlow v. Enlow
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1970-06-26· cited 6×
• Molloy v. Molloy
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1970-11-20· cited 2×
• Quinn v. Franzman
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1970-03-13· cited 1×
• 2026 Ca Admin - Non-Confidential Opinion - 003
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2026-03-13

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wells v. Wells
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1967-03-10· cited 41×
• Gates v. Gates
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1967-01-27· cited 22×
• Hall v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1964-11-20· cited 11×
• Wilkey v. Glisson
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1957-06-21· cited 8×
• Kelien v. Kelien
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1954-12-03· cited 6×
• Smith v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1968-06-21· cited 6×
• Knight v. Knight
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1967-09-29· cited 4×
• Pemberton v. Pemberton
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1966-09-30· cited 1×