Morris v. HUFF

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• question by plaintiff's counsel as to whether the owner of an automobile would have to pay a judgment, as well as a statement by plaintiff's counsel that \the [owners] will not have to pay one penny even though they own the truck\ was improper and constituted reversible error.
• question by plaintiff’s counsel as to whether the owner of an automobile would have to pay a judgment, as well as a statement by plaintiff’s counsel that “the [owners] will not have to pay one penny even though they own the truck” was improper and constituted reversible error.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).