Morris v. Flaig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “mixed questions of law and fact” are inappropriate for § 1292(b) certification
• mere claim that a court’s decision was incorrect does not suffice to establish substantial ground for a difference of opinion
• where punitive damages award was “not reasonably related to the harm done,” conditionally remitting damages, and, if remittitur is not accepted by plaintiff, ordering a new trial
• where punitive damages award was “not reasonably related to the harm done,” conditionally remitting damages, and, if remittitur is not accepted by plaintiff, ordering a new trial
• “This final factor requires a comparison to awards authorized in similar cases.”
• \This final factor requires a comparison to awards authorized in similar cases.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).