Skip to main content
· 11/4/1988

Morris v. Ergos

Citations

  • 532 So. 2d 1360
  • 1988 WL 115957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal is not necessarily warranted even when a party's conduct in response to discovery requests is \laggard and slothful\
  • striking a defendant doctor's defenses for failure to timely respond to presuit discovery requests held too harsh a remedy in absence of prejudice to plaintiff
  • striking a defendant doctor's defenses for failure to timely respond to presuit discovery was too harsh in the absence of prejudice to the plaintiff.
  • striking a defendant doctor's defenses for failure to timely respond to presuit discovery requests held too harsh a remedy in the absence of prejudice to plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lehan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.