Skip to main content
· 6/6/2006

Morris v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.

Citations

  • 848 N.E.2d 663
  • 2006 Ind. LEXIS 462
  • 2006 WL 1530026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • submitting to an EUO “was a contractual obligation, not a discovery request.... Compliance was not optional or subject to a trial court determination of reasonableness.”
  • submitting to an EUO “was a contractual obligation, not a discovery request. . . . Compliance was not optional or subject to a trial court determination of reasonableness.”
  • examining insured’s refusal to comply with contractual provision requiring an examination under oath
  • insured must comply with the “specific duties” imposed by a ‘Tour Duties After Loss” provision
  • “A contract for insurance is subject to the same rules of interpretation as are other contracts.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[Reasonableness ... describes how often the insurer can make requests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.