· 6/6/2006
Morris v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.
Citations
- 848 N.E.2d 663
- 2006 Ind. LEXIS 462
- 2006 WL 1530026
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- submitting to an EUO “was a contractual obligation, not a discovery request.... Compliance was not optional or subject to a trial court determination of reasonableness.”
- submitting to an EUO “was a contractual obligation, not a discovery request. . . . Compliance was not optional or subject to a trial court determination of reasonableness.”
- examining insured’s refusal to comply with contractual provision requiring an examination under oath
- insured must comply with the “specific duties” imposed by a ‘Tour Duties After Loss” provision
- “A contract for insurance is subject to the same rules of interpretation as are other contracts.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
- “[Reasonableness ... describes how often the insurer can make requests.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.