Morris v. Capitol Furniture & Appliance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a consumer contract for the purchase of furniture was not unconscionable where the plaintiff was able to buy the goods from another seller
• trial court’s holding that interest was not usurious upheld although trial court’s reason for so holding was erroneous
• trial court's holding that interest was not usurious upheld although trial court's reason for so holding was erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).