Skip to main content
· 1/9/1998

Morris v. Amalgamated Lithographers of America

Citations

  • 994 F. Supp. 161
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1190
  • 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 163
  • 1998 WL 50218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • utilizing the statute of limitations period under Title VII to bar claim that the union retaliated against plaintiff for his activism and criticism of racial discrimination by the union
  • declining to consider evidentiary materials presented for the first time in an objection to the report and recommendation
  • although 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) permits the review of new evidence, “there are substantial reasons for declining to do so as a general matter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.