Morris Shoe Co. v. Coleman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Defendant required employees to complete the HRA only if they wanted to participate in the company’s insurance plan.
• “[PJlaintiffs entire claim is premised on its undisputed allegation that defendant’s employees were required to complete the wellness program before they could enroll in the plan. It is difficult to fathom how such a condition could be anything other than a plan term.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).