Skip to main content
· 4/7/1903

Morris Electric Co. v. Mayer & Englund Co.

Citations

  • 123 F. 311
  • 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4898

Syllabus

<p>1. Patents—Patentable Novelty—Electric Rail Connections.</p> <p>The Wightman patent, No. 460,615, for rail connection for electric railways, claims 8 and 9, describing a flexible conductor, provided at its ends with attached solid blocks beaded in boles in the rails, the purpose being to make an electric connection between the rails, is void for lack of patentable novelty, in view of the prior art.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Questions of exemption arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq.), are determinable in actions brought by the Secretary of Labor and not in actions brought under the Declaratory Judgment Act codified as 28 U.S.C. § 2201.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.