Morris-Bancroft Paper Co. v. Coleman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A statement in the corporate president’s affidavit that “‘the following facts are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief’ ... clearly does not evince compliance with the ‘personal knowledge’ requirement of OCGA § 9-11-56(e).”
• it could not be ascertained from affidavit which facts were “conclusively based upon the affiant’s personal knowledge and which of them may be based merely upon information that he received, in his capacity as appellant’s president, from a source other than his own personal knowledge”
• it could not be ascertained from affidavit which facts were “conclusively based upon the affiant’s personal knowledge and which of them may be based merely upon information that he received, in his capacity as appellant’s president, from a source other than his own personal knowledge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).