Skip to main content
· 5/30/1989

Morris B. Myers v. Regnal W. Garff, Jr., David L. Wilkinson, and Michael F. Skolnick

Citations

  • 876 F.2d 79
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7400
  • 1989 WL 55747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the district court at most should have stayed rather than dismissed [plaintiff's damages] claims” under Younger “because [those claims] cannot be redressed in the pending state proceedings”
  • directing district court to stay claim for damages
  • directing district court to stay claim for damages
  • directing district court to stay claim for damages
  • directing district court to stay claim for damages
  • directing district court to stay claim for damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKay, Seymour, Ebel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.