· 3/6/2002
Morra v. Harrop
Citations
- 791 A.2d 472
- 2002 R.I. LEXIS 44
- 2002 WL 363421
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- striking an expert witness’ testimony and then denying a brief continuance is reversible error
- “the admissibility of expert testimony does not require the use of ‘magic words’ or ‘precisely constructed talismanic incantations’ ”
- \the admissibility of expert testimony does not require the use of `magic words' or `precisely constructed talismanic incantations'\
- explaining the \contemporaneous objection\ rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Williams, Lederberg, Bourcier, Flanders, Goldberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.