Morphy, Makofsky & Masson, Inc. v. CANAL PLACE 2000

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under Louisiana law, quantum meruit should only be understood as a descriptive term of the “measure of compensation or price unstated in a contract,” as opposed to a substantive cause of action
• “[T]he existence of a claim on an express or implied contract precludes application of [unjust enrichment], for there does not exist one of the latter’s requirements, that there be no other remedy available at law ....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).