Moross Ltd. Partnership v. Fleckenstein Capital, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that claims of misrepresentation and nondisclosure of self-dealing did not relate back because they alleged “completely different conduct” from the conduct underlying the cherry-picking claim in the original complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).