Ninth Circuit· 1/16/2009
Morley v. Smith
Citations
- 309 F. App'x 103
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding 18 defendant’s sending of emails and engaging in petition drive did not rise to level of extreme and 19 outrageous conduct
- “We note 7 that when converting a motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment, a judge is 8 required to give the parties a ‘reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to 9 such a motion by Rule 56.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. Yokohama Tire Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2004-01-12· cited 308×
- Annette Thomas v. City of Beaverton Linda Adlard Sandra MillerNinth Circuit· 2004-08-16· cited 169×
- Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation v. City of MontereyNinth Circuit· 1990-12-12· cited 158×
- Green Acres Trust v. LondonArizona Supreme Court· 1984-09-11· cited 126×
- Garaux v. PulleyNinth Circuit· 1984-08-01· cited 123×
- Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-02-04· cited 106×
- Barnes v. OutlawArizona Supreme Court· 1998-09-18· cited 53×
- Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-10-16· cited 45×
- Midas Muffler Shop v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-08-10· cited 45×
- Campbell v. WestdahlCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-10-31· cited 34×
- Miller v. Servicemaster by ReesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-10-15· cited 22×
- Jacobson v. Aeg Capital Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1995-03-29· cited 16×
- Gee v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-04-29· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.