Moritz v. Hoyt Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the United States Supreme Court’s test set forth in Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983)
• “[T]he party prevailing on the significant issues in the litigation is the party that should be considered the prevailing party for attorney’s fees.”
• “[T]he party prevailing on the significant issues in the litigation is the party that should be considered the prevailing party for attorney’s fees.”
• “We agree that the party prevailing on the significant issues in the litigation is the party that should be considered the prevailing party for attorney’s fees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).