Morgenthau v. Estate of Andzel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate review is de novo to the extent the issue turns on statutory interpretation
• “[T]he claim was untimely as appellant did not receive actual notice of the claim and was, thus, a creditor who fell in the three month filing window following publication”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).