Morgenstern Chemical Company, Inc. v. G. D. Searle & Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant \trod a very narrow course when it adopted the name Mictine with full knowledge of the prior use of the name Micturin by the plaintiff\
• “ ‘Prevention of confusion and mistakes in medicines is too vital to be trifled with’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).