· 6/12/1981
Morgenroth & Associates, Inc. v. Town of Tilton
Citations
- 121 N.H. 511
- 431 A.2d 770
- 1981 N.H. LEXIS 359
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating implied-in-fact contract is true contract, as opposed to legal remedy for unjust enrichment
- “the superior court has authority under RSA 491:8 to hear only those claims against the State based on implied in fact contracts ...”
- superior court has jurisdiction to hear claims against the State based on express and implied in fact contracts under RSA 491:8
- \An implied in fact contract is a true contract that is not expressed in words; the terms of the parties' agreement must be inferred from their conduct.\
- town not immune from liability for implied in law contracts
- explaining implied-in-fact and implied-in-law contracts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas, Brock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.