Skip to main content
· 6/12/1981

Morgenroth & Associates, Inc. v. Town of Tilton

Citations

  • 121 N.H. 511
  • 431 A.2d 770
  • 1981 N.H. LEXIS 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating implied-in-fact contract is true contract, as opposed to legal remedy for unjust enrichment
  • “the superior court has authority under RSA 491:8 to hear only those claims against the State based on implied in fact contracts ...”
  • superior court has jurisdiction to hear claims against the State based on express and implied in fact contracts under RSA 491:8
  • \An implied in fact contract is a true contract that is not expressed in words; the terms of the parties' agreement must be inferred from their conduct.\
  • town not immune from liability for implied in law contracts
  • explaining implied-in-fact and implied-in-law contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Brock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.