Skip to main content
· 5/27/1907

Morgan's L. & T. R. & S. S. Co. v. Stewart

Citations

  • 119 La. 961
  • 44 So. 797
  • 1907 La. LEXIS 572

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Dismissal — Irregularities in Bond.</p> <p>Where the appeal bond is sufficiently identified with the judgment appealed from, and the erasures and interlineations complained of are such as could not affect the liability of the surety, the appeal will not be dismissed.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 2, Appeal and Error, § 2050.]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “But there is no reason to find that federal patent law completely preempts any state law claims, including one for unjust enrichment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Monroe, Proyosty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.