Morgan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well settled that the State is not required to specify the intended offense for burglary in its charging document and that a charging document tracking the language of the burglary statute will generally be sufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Bryan Grigg v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-15· cited 6×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sanford v. Rubin
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1970-07-01· cited 197×
• Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-08-17· cited 195×
• State v. Waters
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-28· cited 105×
• Daniels v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2013-06-06· cited 47×
• Gibbs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-01-06· cited 31×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-01· cited 27×
• Barnhill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-06· cited 22×
• Kozakoff v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-12-12· cited 19×
• Dukes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-03-21· cited 19×
• In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report No. 2012-01
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2013-02-14· cited 17×
• Rudolf v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-08· cited 14×
• Stinnett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-11· cited 4×