Wyoming Supreme Court· 8/13/2004

Morgan v. State

Citations

2004 WY 95
95 P.3d 802
2004 WL 1801886

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding the reliance on rulings from other states alone did not “satisfy our specific requirements” for conducting independent constitutional analysis
reiterating that “in order for this Court to undertake an independent state constitutional analysis, the appellant must ‘use a precise and analytically sound approach and provide us with the proper arguments and briefs to ensure the future growth of this important area of law.’”
declining to address issues concerning drug dog's reliability and State's foundation for that reliability on conditional plea appeal where issue was not raised in motion to suppress
“Morgan was not subjected to a search protected by the Fourth Amendment when [law enforcement] ordered the canine sniff of his vehicle.”
appellant waived right to argue a lack of probable cause and failure to establish foundation for reliability of the drug dog where appellant limited the suppression motion to whether an exterior dog sniff constituted a search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Golden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.