Morgan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an evidentiary hearing would be required to determine whether the statute of limitations would have been extended for an additional three years
• holding that the defendant's claim that the statute of limitations had expired on several counts before the State filed its information was an attack on both his conviction and sentence and should be raised pursuant to rule 3.850
• acknowledging “a motion to correct illegal sentence is an appropriate procedure for challenging a sentence, but not a conviction”
• acknowledging “a motion to correct illegal sentence is an appropriate procedure for challenging a sentence, but not a conviction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Riviere v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-28· cited 4×
• McGregor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-20· cited 3×
• JOSE D. RAMIREZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-08-31
• ROQUE ESTEBAN CALAFELL v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-10-12
• TORIN ROBINSON v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-04-12
• LARRY WILLIAMS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-05-24
• DIEGO JIMENEZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-11-01
• Roosevelt Smith v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-10-30

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Spella
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-11· cited 24×
• Wiley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-29· cited 15×
• D.A. v. Florida Department of Children & Families
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-24· cited 1×