Skip to main content

Morgan v. State

Citations

  • 469 S.E.2d 340
  • 220 Ga. App. 198
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 714
  • 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, under §16–1–7(b), similar drug offenses had to be charged together because they occurred “very close in time” as “part of an ongoing chain of events”
  • holding that, under §16–1–7(b), similar drug offenses had to be charged together because they occurred “very close in time” as “part of an ongoing chain of events”
  • holding that, under §16–1–7(b), similar drug offenses had to be charged together because they occurred “very close in time” as “part of an ongoing chain of events”
  • finding that the offenses arose out of the same conduct and transaction when they were part of an ongoing chain of events perpetrated very close in time and witnessed by the same investigative team conducting continuous surveillance
  • offenses that “were part of an ongoing chain of events” arose out of same conduct
  • “In determining whether two offenses arise from the same conduct or transaction, Georgia courts have considered whether the two crimes involve the same parties, circumstances, locations, and times.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Birdsong, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.